"Mathematics is not about numbers, equations, computations or algorithm. It is about understanding"
General theory of relativity and field equationCoordinate transformation | Gravitational waves | Differential Equation
Field equation, this page is all about field equation, field equation of gravity,
Albert Einstein transformed the way we all see the world. Just over one hundred years ago, his theory of Relativity
stunned scientists, but today it is integral to modern thought as the most important scientific discovery of twentieth century.
Field equations are a set of equations in the formulation of general relativity, which gave many fruitful and interesting results about gravity. Time was shown to be the fourth dimension earlier in special theory of relativity. Space and time were combined to form spacetime. To come about this unification Einstein simply modified famous phytagoras law to include time in a certain manner. The spacetime interval was proved to be fundamental to his theory. All measurement is relative. Temporal separation and space separation are different for different observer but spacetime interval is the same for all. There is no basic difference between space and time from relativistic viewpoint. Mass , length and time all became relative. There is just one absolute structure and that is four dimensional spacetime. These were the facts that the theory of special relativity revealed about our world. But Einstein later took bold task to include gravity in framework of theory of relativity. He thought what if gravity is bending and warping of spacetime itself. He successfully explained that gravity was in fact so and finally proposed his field equations.
Take a flat piece of rubber sheet. The sheet is flat in the sense that the distance between two points corresponds to phythagoras's law. So you lay down the coordinates for each point and you can calculate distance exactly according to Pythagoras's law. Now stretch and twist the rubber sheet without tearing or glueing it with other. Now the coordinates will move away from each other with the amount of distance which must differ from point to point. Equal stretch will not give equal distance. The usual law of Pythagoras will no longer hold. You now have a curved surface. Time dimension is excluded for simplicity. This is also known as rubber-sheet analogy of curved spacetime. This is Einstein's general theory of relativity!!!
"As there is such law of gravity , universe can create upon itself"
Field equation of Einstein's General theory of relativity is perhaps one of the greatest theories ever discovered by any human intellect. It reveals certain structure of the physical world, which has great impact on philosophy and science. Gravity can be easily explained using the field equations as a curvature of spacetime. It is a tensor equation and so valid in any reference frame. Although field equation is harder to solve , many exact solutions had been found over a century. Solutions of field equations gave many interesting fact about the universe like black holes, worm hole and time travel. Wor m hole is a hypothetical gateway that connect s two distance regions of space. it can be used as a time machine also. In the movie interstellar the crew of the ship travel through wormhole , which was shown to be a sphere in three dimensions.
DerivationForce in Newtonian framework is the gradient of a gravitational field (φ). The field in Newtonian framework has one quantity and a direction at each point in space. This is equivalent to acceleration that an object experiences due to gravity.
The Laplacian (∇) of the field is proportional to mass density.
Now we consider similar equation of the form given below , which contains Laplacian of metric tensor g(uv).
In general relativity field is the metric tensor g(uv). Metric tensor transforms like a second rank tensor. As a result gravity is solely the result of coordinates tranformation. Metric tensor allows one to calculate distance between two points in spacetime. Suppose you want to calculate distance on the surface of a cylinder. The distances in various direction s are different as the curvature changes along each direction. Metric tensor takes account of all these individual distances to calculate total distance between any two points. On the surface of cylinder there is usually two directions. In space time there are many directions and components of metric tensor track all these directions.
Now calculating the divergence of Einsteing tensor G(ab) and energy momentum tensor T(ab ) and setting them equal to zero we can find the value of constant (μ). Putting back everything in equation (11) we get field equations.
Field equations describe basic interplay between space, time, matter and energy. It reflects a great mathematical as well as philosophical insight. It is a second order partial non linear differential equation.
The constants of the field equations are Cosmological constant Λ, gravitational constant(G), speed of light(c). The cosmological constant (Λ) was proposed by Einstein. His field equations did not allow for a static universe. He wanted to
stop the universe from collapsing in on itself because gravity would contract it. Later he considered it as the biggest blunder of his life, when he knew that universe is indeed expanding. Other parameters of the left hand side are metric tensor, ricci tensor. Divergence of the left hand side
is zero and so is the right hand side of energy momentum tensor. Divergence in relativity is defined through the covariant derivative, which is the 4-dimensional analog of that in Euclidean space.
Euclidean space is a mathematical construct. Euclid first created an axiomatic system which helped Euclidean space to be constructed. Euclidean geometry is the geometry of Euclidean space. There are few axioms and propositions of Euclidean system. The axioms are :
1)To draw a straight line from any point to any point.
2)To produce [extend] a finite straight line continuously in a straight line.
3)To describe a circle with any centre and distance [radius].
4)That all right angles are equal to one another.
5)[The parallel postulate]: That, if a straight line falling on two straight lines make the interior angles on the same side less than two right angles, the two straight lines, if produced indefinitely, meet on that side on which the angles are less than two right angles.
One of the axiom was the parallel postulates. Parallel lines are the lines which do not intersect themselves. Given a line in a plane there two class of lines , which cuts the given line and which do not. Paralel lines to this given line is defined to limit of these two classes.
It was refusal to admit the parallel postulates without proof that began the development of meta-geometry or non-euclidean geometry. There are other cases where parallel postulate does not hold. For example on the surface of a sphere (elliptic geometry) where parallel lines do meet. Such elliptic space is positively curved.
Our space is similarly curved due to presence of mass and energy content of the universe . Space in our solar system is curved due to the mass of sun and other planet. But we can not directly percieve such curved space because of our restricted sens e. Think about a bug living on the surface of a sphere. The bug does not know that he is actually living in higher dimension other than its surface. But Gauss had shown that we need not reference higher dimension in order to infer the curvature of any space. The metric of any space can reveal the intrinsic curvature. So we can easily find out any properties of our space without thinking about how our three dimensional space is embedded in higher dimensions.
We can decompose the field equation into individual components like this : .
In empty space the field equations reduce to simpler form : .
So what are the field equations all about? It suggests that the material world is intimately connected with the curvature of spacetime. Geometry is the same as physics. The field equation is a system of ten simultaneous separate
equations which correspond to the ten independent components of metric tensor. In the right hand side , the constant quantity is very small. So a large amount of mass is needed to create a little spacetime curvature.
In theoretical consideration, even an electron can create some spacetime curvature as it has some mass. As the mass of electron is too small, The curvature created by it is too small.
That the space is curved refers to the fact that the ratio of circumference to the radius is not the constant 2π rather it is greater or less than 2π. When the ratio is greater than 2π , it is characterized by hyperbolic geometry and when it is less than 2π , it is characterized by elliptic geometry. In Euclidean geometry it is exactly 2π.
The development of non-Euclean geometry took a long time. When Einstein used it , it became clear that our space is indeed curved and Euclidean axioms and propositions only hold in a limiting case of that. The curvature can be explained in terms of amount of deviation of total angle of a triange in curved space from that in Euclidean space as the area of the triangle shrinks to zero.
Two dimensional surface is characterized by geodesics. Plane in Euclidean geometry is an special case of two dimensional manifold s. At every point on a two dimensional manifold there are infinite number of geodesics that pass through it. These geodesic are arcs which have measures of curvature. Among them there are two of which the measure of curvature is either least or greatest. These two measures of curvature determine the curvature of surface at the particular point i.e the product of the two. If the measure of curvature is the same at every point then the surface is said to be of constant cur vature. Sphere is an example of surface of constant curvature. Such curved surface deviates away from a plane which is tangent to it at every point. So the amount by which the surface pulls away from the plane is quadratic in the coordinates measured from the point of tangency. We expect similar thing to happen in four dimensions. In four dimensions there are a number of surfaces that pass through a point. Each surface has a curvature defined at the point so the total curvature of the space will be a collection of numbers.
Field equation is the theory of gravity which Einstein struggled for ten years to find out. Mach's idea influenced Einstein to develop his theory. Mach's idea was that there is no absolute rotation. Newton thought that motion and acceleration was absolute. He demonstrated a famous experiment known as "Newton's bucket" to prove this. But later Mach refuted his claim and told that the said acceleration is relative to all the stars and nebulae in universe. The water in the Newton's bucket is really rotating with respect to the entire mass content of the universe. Field equation is the best description of our physical world in macroscopic perspective. Field equations say not only mass energy creates gravitational field but also pressure and stress contribute to the gravity.
Where there is no matter the equation takes a simple form. This is the so called vacuum condition: R(ik) = 0 . Ricci tensor vanishes but the Riemann curvature tensor does not necessary vanish. Some components of the Riemann curvature tensor can exist. Empty space can be curved too. What it means is that average scalar curvature is zero. Einstein's field equation is very hard too solve. German physicist Karl Swardchild first found the exact solution of the field equation. This solution is used to describe the spacetime around a star when it turns into a black hole. The solution is relatively hard to derive from the field equation. But we can surely give a try.
First we consider an isolated object of mass M. Surrounding spacetime around the object will be curved by its mass. So we need to find the metric that can describe the spacetime distortion around the object. We use spherical polar coordinate system which has coordinates r, θ and φ. we need an additional coordinate t. So a set (r, θ,φ, t) will describe the non-euclidean spacetime around the object.
We apply symmetry under each coordinate change from positive to negative. Using the properties of metric tensor's transformation we see that all the components vanish except
the diagonal components. The combination of these diagonal components will be our final form of metric.
Next we let U= g(11) and V= g(44) and compute the components of Christoffel symbols. We can use the formula where it contains the derivative of metric tensors. After tedious computation we can get four independent components of christoffel symbols which can be used in the vacuum equations. These symbols become simplified under certain conditions.
The covariant metric tensor is the negative one (-1) multiplied the inverse of contravariant one. Each individual component of Christofel symbol is calculated using this inverse metric and derivative of metric tensor's components. Most of the Off-diagonal components seems to vanish.
Now the values of some christoffel symbols are calculated.
Similarly some others are calculated for individual indices. Christoffel symbol's component are symmetric in lower indices. Now the task is to compute ricci tensor components. The diagonal components R(00) and R(11) are computed for brevity.
Now the Einstein tensor G(00) and G(11) is determined where Ricci scalar is used.
In the weak field limit when r tends to infinity the value of U=A=g(44) and V=B(r)= must take the value of that of Minkoswki metric. Thus we finally find the value of U in terms of mass (m) of the object and radius r.
Finally putting the value of U and V in the line element we get the metric of the spacetime around the object of mass m. This is so called exact solution of Einstein field equation.
It has predicted the existence of black hole. So far large number of such black holes have been discovered. Our milky way contains a black holes that is a million times heavier
than the sun. Heavier star collapses under the pull of gravitational field of it after it has run out of its fuel.
The nonlinearity of the EFE makes finding exact solutions hard. One way of solving the field equations is to make an approximation, namely, that far from the source(s) of gravitating matter, gravitational field is very feeble and the spacetime approximates to that of Minkowski space. The metric is then written as the sum of the Minkowski metric and a term denoting the deviation of the true metric from the Minkowski metric, with terms that are quadratic in or higher powers of the deviation being disregarded. This linearization procedure can be used to investigate the phenomena of gravitational radiation.
The distorted picture of spacetime around a massive object will look like something like this:
"nature abhors a nacked singularity!"The most attractive part of the universe is curvy. Space tells matter how to move and matter tells space how to curve. This is the most beautiful theory in physics.
The importance of geodesics came from the idea that freely moving bodies experiencing no other forces
except gravity move in geodesics. In field equation the concept of geodesic is implicit. What is geodesic really?
A lonely pedestrian in Alps might want to go from one valley to another. He surely want to find shortest route from one valley to another. Shotest route is to mean the path between the two places while reamining on the earth everytime. He can not find it by drawing a straight line on the map. For the average gradient of some path can be greater that others which slopes gradually from one pass and down again on the next. What he is seeking is geodesics. The general definition of geodesic is not shortest route. Geodesic is the path such that distance from one point to another on it is stationary. Silght different paths are either longer or slightly differnt paths are shorter. First order change of path length is zero. This is the problem of maximizing and minizing a function. Geodesic path on the surface of the earth is the great circle. For many complicated surface the geodesic can be very complicated curve. In theory of relativity geodesic is the path of longest time. This is so because the distance in relativity is time-like. When it is possible for a material particle to travel between two events , the interval in spacetime is what seems like the lapse of time between those events. It is unlike the usual distance in Euclidean geometry.
There is one matter of great importance , which is not clear in the usual accounts of relativity theory. How are to know that given two events in spacetime, they are happening to the same piece of matter ? An electron and a proton are supposed to preserve its identity thoughout the time considered. But out continumm is a continuum of events. So one must suppose that one piece of matter is a series of events or series of sets of events. There is no specific criterion to determine whether a piece of matter belong to any such series. It is not supposed that events that overlap at the same place and time belongs to one piece of matter belong to no other. It is also supposed that events that have spacelike interval or zero interval does not belong to same piece of matter. But in case of timelike interval there is no obvious criterion. Two events which have time-like interval can always be connected by a geodesic and as the laws of dynamics suggest events on it will belong to the same piece of matter. Still we sometimes think they do and sometimes they don't.
To sum up the above lengthy discussion about field equation, spacetime has a four dimensional order of events. At each event of spacetime, the field equations are satisfied by the value of the coordinates of the event. In particular , at each event metric tensor has ten components which corresponds to ten non linear differential equations. There are twenty one numbers at each event, corresponding to various curvature components of Riemann curvature tensor. The events satisfying field equations have very complicated non linear realtions among them.
This website is mine. I am a self-claimed scientist. I am a writer too. I am trying to build this website for mass people and education. My goal is to make everybody aware of science and technology. I have tried my best to share my knowledge and experience here. But at this moment I have to give a lot of effort and money to others , which I can hardly manage. If you like reading my website, I will be happy and if not , please do not go away from it. Ads are displayed on front page. If you click on it, I will get some money. Thus my wrtiting will be worthful. One click can make both of us happy. Your contribution can change the world. If you invest in learning and education , you will be rewarded in future. Thank you
You can provide your comment and response about field equations below:
You told us how an almost churchlike atmosphere is pervading your desolate house now. And justifiably so, for unusual divine powers are at work in there.
Besso to Einstein, 30 Oct 1915
The basis of Einstein's general theory of relativity is the bold idea that not only do the metrical relations of spacetime deviate from perfect Euclidean flatness, but that the metric itself is a dynamical object. In every other field theory the equations describe the behavior of a physical field, such as the electric or magnetic field, within a constant and immutable arena of space and time, but the field equations of general relativity describe the behavior of space and time themselves. The spacetime metric is the field. This fact is so familiar that we may be inclined to simply accept it without reflecting on how ambitious it is, and how miraculous it is that such a theory is even possible, not to mention comprehensible. Spacetime plays a dual role in this theory, because it constitutes both the dynamical object and the context within which the dynamics are defined. This self-referential aspect gives general relativity certain characteristics different from any other field theory. For example, in other theories we formulate a Cauchy initial value problem by specifying the condition of the field everywhere at a given instant, and then use the field equations to determine the future evolution of the field. In contrast, because of the inherent self-referential quality of the metrical field, we are not free to specify arbitrary initial conditions, but only conditions that already satisfy certain self-consistency requirements (a system of differential relations called the Bianchi identities) imposed by the field equations themselves. The self-referential quality of the metric field equations also manifests itself in their non-linearity. Under the laws of general relativity, every form of stress-energy creates gravitation, including gravitation itself. This is really unavoidable for a theory in which the metrical relations between entities fix the "positions" of those entities, and those positions in turn affects the metric. This non-linearity arises both practical and theoretical issues. From a practical standpoint, it ensures that exact analytical solutions will be very difficult to find except in special cases. More importantly, from a conceptual standpoint, non-linearity make sure that the field cannot in general be uniquely defined by the distribution of material objects, because variations in the field itself can serve as " material objects". Furthermore, after eschewing the comfortable but trusting principle of inertia as a suitable foundation for physics, Einstein concluded that "in the general theory of relativity, space and time cannot be defined in such a way that differences of the spatial coordinates can be directly measured by the unit measuring rod, or differences in the time coordinate by a standard clock...this requirement ... takes away from space and time the last vestige of physical objectivity".
It seems that we're completely at sea, unable to even begin to hypothesize a definite solution, and lacking any definite system of reference for defining even the most elementary quantities. It's not obvious how a viable physical theory could emerge from such an austere level of abstraction. These difficulties no doubt explain why Einstein's path to the field equations in the years 1907 to 1915 was so twisted, with so much confusion and backtracking. One of the principles that heuristically guided his search was what he called the principle of general covariance. This was understood to mean that the laws of physics should be expressible in the form of tensor equations, because such equations automatically hold with respect to any system of curvilinear coordinates (within a given diffeomorphism class). He abandoned this principle at some stage, holding that he and Grossmann had proven it could not be made coherent with the Poisson equation of Newtonian gravitation, but he subsequently realized the invalidity of their arguments, and re-embraced general covariance as a fundamental principle of formulation of GR.
It strikes many people as ironic that Einstein found the principle of general covariance to be so engaging, because, strictly speaking, it's possible to express almost any physical law, including Newton's laws, in generally covariant form (i.e., as tensor equations). This was not clear when Einstein first formulated general relativity, but it was shown in one of the very first published critiques of Einstein's 1916 paper, and immediately acknowledged by Einstein. It's worth remembering that the generally covariant formalism had been developed only in 1901 by Ricci and Levi-Civita, and the first real use of it in physics was Einstein's formulation of general relativity. This historical accident made it spontaneous for people (including Einstein, at first) to imagine that general relativity is distinguished from other theories by its general covariance, whereas in fact general covariance was only a new mathematical formalism, and does not connote a distinguishing physical attribute. For this reason, some people have been tempted to concede that the requirement of general covariance is actually vacuous. In reply to this criticism, Einstein clarified the real meaning (for him) of this principle, showing that its heuristic value arises when combined with the idea that the laws of physics should not only be expressible as tensor equations, but should be expressible as simple tensor equations. In 1918 he wrote "Of two theoretical systems which accord with experience, that one is to be preferred which from the point of view of the absolute differential calculus is the simplest and most transparent". This is still a bit unclear, but it seems that the quality which Einstein had in mind was closely related to the Machian idea that the expression of the dynamical laws of a theory should be symmetrical up to arbitrary continuous transformations of the spacetime coordinates.
Of course, the presence of any particle of matter with a determinate state of motion automatically breaks the symmetry, but a particle of matter is a dynamical object of the theory. The general principle that Einstein had in mind was that only dynamical objects could be permitted to introduce asymmetries. This leads naturally to the conclusion that the coefficients of the spacetime metric itself must be dynamical elements of the theory, i.e., must be acted upon. In this way, Einstein believed he had pointed out what he regarded as the strongest of Mach's criticisms of Newtonian spacetime, namely, the fact that Newton's space acted on objects but was never acted upon by objects.
Let's follow Einstein's original presentation in his famous paper "The Foundation of the General Theory of Relativity", which was published early in 1916. He noticed that for empty space, far from any gravitating object, we expect to have flat (i.e., Minkowskian) spacetime, which amounts to demanding that Riemann's curvature tensor R(abcd) vanishes. However, in regions of space near gravitating matter we must clearly have non-zero intrinsic curvature, because the gravitational field of an object cannot simply be "transformed away" (to the second order) by a change of coordinates. Thus there is no system of coordinates with respect to which the manifold is flat to the second order, which is exactly the condition indicated by a non-vanishing Riemann curvature tensor. Nevertheless, even at points where the full curvature tensor R(abcd) is not zero, the contracted tensor of the second rank, R(bc)= g(ad)R(abcd) = R(dbcd) may vanish. Now, a tensor of rank four can be contracted in six different ways (the number of ways of choosing two of the four indices), and in general this brings six distinct tensors of rank two. We are able to single out a more or less sistinct contraction of the curvature tensor only because of that tensor’s symmetries , which suggest that of the six contractions of R(abcd), two are zero and the other four are identical up to sign flip.
By convention we define the Ricci tensor R(bc) as the contraction g(ad)R(abcd). In seeking favorable conditions for the metric field in empty space, Einstein observes that …there is only a minimum arbitrariness in the choice... for besides R(mn) there is no tensor of rank two which is formed from the g(mn) and it derivatives, contains no derivatives higher than the second, and is linear in these derivatives. This prompts us to require for the matter-free gravitational field that the symmetrical tensor R(mn) ... shall vanish. Thus, guided by the belief that the laws of physics should be the simplest possible tensor equations (to ensure general covariance), he proposes that the field equations for the gravitational field in empty space should be
Noting that R(mn) takes on a particularly simple form on the condition that we choose coordinates such that = 1, Einstein originally expressed this in terms of the Christoffel symbols as
(In his 1916 paper Einstein had a different sign because he defined the symbol Γabc as the negative of the Christoffel symbol of the second kind.) He then concludes the section with words that obviously gave him great pleasure, since he repeated essentially the same comments at the conclusion of the paper: These equations, which proceed, by the method of pure mathematics, from the requirement of the general theory of relativity, give us, in combination with the [geodesic] equations of motion, to a first approximation Newton's law of gravity, and to a second approximation the explanation of the precession of the perihelion of the planet Mercury discovered by Leverrier. These facts must, in my opinion, be taken as a convincing proof of the validity of the theory. To his friend Paul Ehrenfest in January 1916 he wrote that "for a few days I was beside myself with joyous excitement", and to Fokker he said that seeing the abnormalities in Mercury's orbit emerge naturally from his purely geometrical field equations "had given him palpitations of the heart". (These recollections are remarkably similar to the presumably spurious story of Newton's trembling hand when he learned, in 1675, of Picard's revised estimates of the Earth's size, and was thereby able to reconcile his previous calculations of the Moon's orbit based on the assumption of an inverse-square law of gravitation.)
The identity R(mn) = 0 gives ten distinct equations in the ten unknown metric components gmn at each point in empty spacetime (where the term "empty" signifies the absence of matter or electromagnetic energy, but obviously not the absence of the metric/gravitational field.) Since these equations are generally covariant tensor equations, it implies that given any single solution we can construct infinitely many others simply by applying arbitrary (continuous) coordinate transformations. So each individual physical solution has four full degrees of freedom which allow it to be expressed in different ways. In order to uniquely fix a particular solution we must impose four coordinate conditions on the g(mn), but this gives us a total of fourteen equations in just ten unknowns, which could not be expected to have any non-trivial solutions at all if the fourteen equations were fully independent and arbitrary. Our only hope is if the ten formal conditions represented by our basic field equations automatically satisfy four identities for any values of the metric tensor's components, so that they really only impose six independent conditions, which then would uniquely fix a solution when augmented by a set of four arbitrary coordinate conditions. It isn't hard to guess that the four "automatic" conditions to be satisfied by our field equations must be the vanishing of the covariant derivatives, since this will guarantee local conservation of any energy-momentum source term that we may place on the right side of the equation, analogous to the mass density on the right side of Poisson's equation
where we’ve chosen units so that Newton’s gravitational constant equals 1. In tensor calculus the divergence generalizes to the covariant derivative, so we expect that the covariant derivatives of the metrical field equations must identically vanish too. The Ricci tensor R(mn) itself does not satisfy this requirement, but we can form a tensor that does satisfy the requirements (using the Bianchi identity as explained below) with just a slight modification of the Ricci tensor, and without disturbing the relation R(mn ) = 0 for empty space. Subtracting half the metric tensor times the invariant R = g(mn)R(mn) gives what is now called the Einstein Tensor
Obviously the condition R(mn) = 0 implies G(mn) = 0. Conversely, if G(mn) = 0 we can see from the mixed form
that R must be zero, because otherwise Rmn would need to be diagonal, with the components R/2, which doesn't contract to the scalar R (except in two dimensions). Consequently, the condition Gmn = 0 is equivalent to Rmn = 0 for empty space, but for coupling with a non-zero source term we must use G(mn) to represent the metrical field. To represent the "source term" we will use the covariant energy-momentum tensor T(mn), and regard it as the "cause" of the metric curvature (although one might also conceive of the metric curvature as, in some temporally symmetrical sense, "causing" the energy-momentum). The components of this symmetrical tensor are the fluxes of the four components of momentum in each of the four directions. Thus the time-time component T(00) is the mass-energy density, T(0j) are the translational momenta, and the remaining T(jk) are momentum fluxes signifying pressures and shear stresses. (For this reason, Tμν is sometimes called the stress-energy tensor.) Einstein acknowledged that the introduction of this tensor is not vindicated by the relativity principle alone, but it has the virtues of being closely related by analogy with the Poisson equation from Newton's theory, it gives local conservation of energy and momentum, and finally it implies gravitational energy gravitates just as does every other form of energy. On this basis we surmise that the field equations coupled to the source term can be written in the form G(mn) = kT(mn) where k is a constant which must equal −8π (remembering that Newton's gravitational constant is 1 in our units) in order for the field equations to reduce to Newton's law in the weak field limit. Thus we have the complete expression of Einstein's metrical law of general relativity
The minus sign of the right hand side is due to our choice of g(ad)R(abcd) for the definition of the Ricci tensor. As noted above, this is the negative of g(ac)R(abcd), which we could just as well have chosen as the definition of the Ricci tensor, in which case the sign of the right side of (2) would be positive. The choice is purely conventional. It's worth noting that although the left side of the field equations is quite pure and almost uniquely determined by mathematical requirements, the right side is a hodge-podge of miscellaneous "stuff". As Einstein wrote, The energy tensor can be considered only as a provisional means of representing matter. In reality, matter consists of electrically charged particles... It is only the circumstance that we have no sufficient knowledge of the electromagnetic field of concentrated charges that forces us, provisionally, to leave undetermined in presenting the theory, the true form of this tensor... The right hand side [of (2)] is a formal condensation of all things whose comprehension in the sense of a field theory is still problematic. Not for a moment... did I doubt that this formulation was merely a makeshift in order to give the general principle of relativity a preliminary closed-form expression. For it was essentially no more than a theory of the gravitational field, which was isolated somewhat artificially from a total field of as yet unknown structure. Alas, neither Einstein nor anyone since has been able to make further progress in determining the true form of the right hand side of (2), although it is at the heart of current efforts to reconcile quantum field theory with general relativity. At present we must be content to let T(mn) represent, in a vague sort of way, the energy density of the electromagnetic field and matter. A different (but equivalent) form of the field equations can be found by contracting (2) with g(mn) to give R - 2R = -R = -8πT, and then substituting for R in (2) to give
Notes and additional commentsG(mn) is a rank two tensor. So it R(mn) and g(ab). Field equation is a tensor equation. Without the knowledge of tensor theory of general relativity is hard to understand. Tensor formalism has the beauty of simplicity and elegance. For interested reader s this tensor analysis page can be very helpful.
We know that general theory of relativity connects geometry with physics. But what is geometry ?
Geometry is a scientific knowledge and branch of Mathematics. It deals with spatial magnitudes. Any kind of geometry is possible if four axioms are satified :
a) continuity and dimensions : In a space of n dimension , a point is uniquely determined by n continuously changing variables.
b) lines and points: two points uniquely determine a straight line. Between 2n coordinates of a rigid body there exist a equation, which is the same for all congruent point pairs of the body. By considering sufficient number of point-pairs, we get more equations than unknown quantities: this gives us a method for detrmining the form of these equations , so that all can be satisfied.
b) axiom of free mobility: eEvery point can pass freely from one position to other. From (2) and (3) it follows that if two systems A, B can be brought into congruence in any position, it can be done in any position.
c) Axiom of rotation of rigid body(Monodromy): if (n-1) points of a rigid body remain fixed so that every other point describes a certain curve then the curve is closed
Solipsism is the idea that only the mind exist. Nothing outside the mind exists. There is certain reason to believe in solipsism. This material world is the projection of our mind. What we see is just The figment of our imagination. What if this world is just a scientific construct. The people who believe in solipsism is called solipsists. solipsism is philosophically the same thing as idealism. Idealism states that only ideas and concepts create our reality. All these evidences certainly support in favour of solipsism.
Before roceeding to the laws of motion, which introduce new complications of which some are difficult to express in terms of pure mathematics, I wish briefly to define in logical language the dynamical world as it results from previous chapters. Let t be a one-dimensional continuous series, s a three-dimensional continuous series, which we will not assume to be Euclidean as yet. If R be a many-one relation whose domain is t and whose converse domain is contained in s, then R defines a motion of a material particle. The indestructibility and ingenerability of matter are expressed in the fact that R has the whole of t for its field. Let us assume further that R defines a continuous function in s. In order to define the motions of a material system, it is only necessary to consider a class of relations having the properties assigned above to R, and such that the logical product of any two of them is null. This last condition expresses impenetrability. For it asserts that no two of our relations relate the same moment to the same point, i.e. no two particles can be at the same place at the same time. A set of relations fulfilling these conditions will be called a class of kinematical motions. With these conditions, we have all that kinematics requires for the definition of matter; and if the descriptive school were wholly in the right, our definition would not add the new condition which takes us from kinematics to kinetics. Nevertheless this condition is essential to inference from events at one time to events at another, without which Dynamics would lose its distinctive feature.