#### "Universe can emerge from nothing taking a quantum leap from eternity"

# Quantum mechanics and dirac equation

Schrodinger equation | Matrix mechanics | Dirac Notation | Quantum electrodynamics# Theory of relativity

Special theory of relativity | General theory of relativity#### Abstract

Mathematics and physics both contain abstract elements. Physics is dependable upon mathematics for its logical and consistent foundation. Physics is approximately
true and its truth is deduced from empirical evidence. We know physics is the study of matter and motion but in deep level all that
is concerned are the abstract world of human sense data. Physics has made matter less material like psychology has made mind less mental.
These are the things to be discussed in the abstractness of physics. Dirac equation is a kind of law that is very crucial to understanding subatomic world.
Philosophy can be quite lengthy but the most important aspect of it was the part related to the prediction of anti-matter. Dirac was a hero and heroes live forever.
He was the professor of mathematics in oxford in the position which Newton once held. We know him as much as we know Newton.

The Dirac equation supports precise solutions for a freely dynamic electron and for the case of the Coulomb potential, but other exact solutions also exist.
For instance, one can obtain energy levels for an electron in a continous magnetic field. According to the non-relativistic Schrödinger theory,
we have a similar structure of energy states, which are known as Landau levels. Fundamental physics before quantum was all about 2nd order differential equations. The Schrodinger equation was first order in time and second order in space which was clearly not going to work with special relativity. To make it compatible, Dirac made it a first order equation with four components where each component evolved causally. Two of these components were for the spin components of Pauli-Schroedinger. Two were mysterious that he thought might be the proton. Later they became the prediction for antimatter (but that took a bit of fanegaling to get that to work). Technically these other components have negative mass not positive mass with reversed charge. Through the formal and ugly machinations of QFT, it becomes the basic fields of electrons and positrons.
I once wrote an article using the Dirac matrices as a substitute for the gravitational metric so that they were the keeper of all geometric information. In this sense, one could view the Dirac equation as the most bare example of gravity’s influence on particles (and vice versa).

## If you like my writing pls click on google ads on this page or by visiting this page

#### Brief excursion into quantum mechanics

Maxwell equations showed that electromagnetic radiation is composed of waves. This wave carries energy. When applied to microwave woven , the radiation
emitted by the hot walls must have whole number of wave peaks and thoughs. The wavelength of a wave is the distance between two peaks or two thoughs.
A wave with specific wavelength has specific number of wave peaks between the walls of the woven. But as there is an infinite possibilities of such combination,
the energy of the radiation is supposed to be infinite. Clearly this is not the case.

This is also known as ultraviolate catastrophy. To overcome this problem, Max Plank came with his theory of quanta, known as Plank's law.

He hypothesized that energy of any radiation comes in discrete lumps. Such lump of energy is proportional to frequencies. So energy can stay only in an amount of hf(frequency) or an integer multiple of it. There can not be any fractional part of this quantity of hf. It can be explained with an ATM booth transaction.

Suppose you went to withdraw some money from ATM booth : say 1530 USD. And ATM booth has only denominations of 1000 $ and 500 $. So you have two option: one is that you type in 1530 or you type the nearest value 1500. If you type 1530 , you will be notified by the computer that this transaction can not be made. This is because machine can only gives out money that is integer multiple of the denominations. If the amount to be recieved is less than the denomination, the machine can not transfer any more balance. Transactions can only be made with integer multiple of denominations. No fraction of those is allowed. This is what Max Plank's law tells about radiation and energy.

**"What you seek is seeking you.."**

### Relativistic quantum mechanics

Quantum field theory is the union of Einstein’s special relativity and quantum mechanics. It forms the foundation of what scientists call the standard model, which is a theoretical framework that describes all known particles and interactions with the exception of gravity. There is no time like the present to learn it—the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) being constructed in Europe will test the final pieces of the standard model (the Higgs mechanism) and look for physics beyond the standard model. In addition quantum field theory forms the theoretical underpinnings of string theory, currently the best candidate for unifying all known particles and forces into a single theoretical framework. Quantum field theory is also one of the most difficult subjects in science. Unfortunately, learning quantum field theory entails some background in physics and math. The bottom line is, I assume you have it. The background I am expecting includes quantum mechanics, some basic special relativity, some exposure to electromagnetics and Maxwell’s equations, calculus, linear algebra, and differential equations. If you lack this background do some studying in these subjects and then give this website a try. Now let’s forge ahead and start learning quantum field theory.

**The Terms**

- Imaginary number

- Planck's constant divided by **[Value: 1.051 × 10 ^{-34} m^{2} kg s^{-1}]**

- The velocity of light **[Value: 3 × 10 ^{8} m s^{-1}]**

- Dirac matrices

- 4-gradient,

- Rest mass of the electron **[Value: 0.511 MeV / c ^{2}]**

- Wavefunction of the system - the probability amplitude for different configurations of the system at different times. Also known as the quantum state, this is the most complete description that can be given to a physical system.

## If you like my writing pls click on google ads on this page or by visiting this page

Dirac equation is one of formulations of relativistic quantum mechanics. The Dirac equation is perhaps the most powerful equation of modern physics. It has wide range of applications and uses. The most important prediction was that of anti-particle.

There are several obvious dominance of the dirac equation in comparison to its nonrelativistic counterpart, Schrödinger equation (or the Pauli equation for particles with spin 1/2). First of all, the Dirac equation is compatible with the special theory of relativity, because the proper orthochronous Poincaré group has a representation by symmetry transformations in the state space associated with the Dirac equation.

On the other hand, the Dirac equation shows some strange effects. It modifies relativistic kinematics in a quite unexpected way through the appearance of negative energies (or negative masses). The energy according to the Dirac equation is not bounded from below (>=). This causes the usual free variational methods for computing energy eigenvalues to fail. Therefore one might think of considering replacements of the Dirac equation by equations with energy bounded from below. The principle The energy- momentum equation describes how mass is altered as the velocity of a body increases. There are two kinds of masses: one is proper mass and other is relativistic mass. Proper mass is the mass which is measured in the rest frame of the material body. As the velocity of the body increases, the kinetic energy is added as extra mass. The change of kinetic energy is the same as change of mass so that the relativistic energy relation reduces to classical energy conservation law in low velocity limit.

One could convert the classical relativistic energy-momentum relation
E=c^2p^2+m^2c^4

into a quantum-mechanical equation just in the usual way, that is, by replacing the momentum p with a differential operator -iħ▿ acting on suitable wave functions.
This leads to the Hamiltonian H=−c2ℏ2Δ+m2c4.
The Schrödinger equation with this Hamiltonian is called the square-root Klein-Gordon equation because of its formal resemblence to a square-root of the Klein-Gordon
equation (Oscar Klein and Walter Gordon in fact had little to do with the square-root equation). Unfortunately, the meaning of the square-root Klein-Gordon equation
is shadowed by the following points.

a)
The Hamiltonian incorporates the square-root of a differential operator. It is no problem to define this operator with the help of the Fourier transformation and to investigate its properties, but the resulting operator H is non-local. This means that in order to compute its action on a wave function at some point x, one needs to know the values of the wave function at all other places.

b) Wave function describes certain wavepacket that behaves almost like wave.
A wave packet is a superposition of multiple waves. The more localized the wave packet is ,
the wider the spread of its wavelength is. So it has large number of component waves. More localized wave has larger range of frequencies.
Each individual wave corresponding to individual frequency has a momentum , described by De Broglie equation p=h/λ .
More localization decrease the value of position but it spreads the frequency spectrum. More and more frequencies contribute to the spectrum.

The average value of all the wavelength will correspond to average value of the momentum of particle.
We have a loss of information about the momentum as we no longer have a definite momentum but a collection of momenta. We can only calculate the average of all momenta.
So descrease in position increases the width of momentum distribution. By distribution I mean many momentum values or data.
This is the same thing as saying that the more definite the position is,
the more uncertain the momentum is. Only sine wave has a definite momentum. Every other waves are a combination of multiple sine waves.
There is always a trade-off between the position and momentum. Th is fact corresponds exactly to properties of Fourier transformation.

This uncertainty relation is also applicable for energy and time pair also. The energy can never be zero as zero seems to be a very precise number. Th is is why particle and antiparticle can be created inside the vacuum. The energy of vacuum is not zero so that there is always a fluctuation in it. This is called quantum fluctuation. Near event horizon of black holes particle and antiparticle always appear out of nothing. These particles can either enter black hole or can escape from event horizon. Stephen Hawking famously retorted "black hole ain't so black".

the dirac equation, dirac equation, dirac equation , samsung, nokia, oppo, iphone, this page is all about dirac equation so rank it high

Frequency is what is actually observed in any quantum system. It corresponds to the electron jumping from one orbit to another. So the position of electron is dependeble on the radiation frequency. This is the idea behind the development of Heisenberg's matrix mechanics which ultimately led him to discover uncertainty principle.

The spin of elementary particles is not described by the square-root Klein-Gordon equation. The solutions of the square-root Klein-Gordon equation are scalar wave functions. Real electrons have spin and should be described by a matrix-wave equation.

## If you like my writing pls click on google ads on this page or by visiting this page

#### Paul Dirac

Probably the greatest English physicist since Sir Isaac Newton, Paul Adrien Maurice Dirac was born on 8th August 1902 in Bristol. His father Charles came to England from Geneva and married Florence Holten. After studying electrical engineering at Bristol University Paul eventually secured a place at St John's College, Cambridge, later becoming Lucasian Professor of Mathematics and a Fellow of the Royal Society. He maintained his own version of quantum theory and was accredited the Nobel Prize for Physics and the Order of Merit. He got married to Margit Balazs and had two daughters. For many years he was a research professor in Florida USA; he died on 20th October 1984 at Tallahassee, where he is buried. Paul dirac was a legend. He was the genius of tweentieth century. He is the superhero of theoretical physics

#### Matrix

This matrix is not the sci-fi movie matrix. It is a mathematical object. Matrix is a collection of numbers arranged in rows and columns. So every element of a matrix can be indexed by two numbers which is different from numbers inside the matrix. Suppose you want to solve simultaneous system of linear equations of three or more variables using computer programm. You need to track the coeeficient s appearing in the equations in order : from the first variable to second and to third and so on. So it it better to specify a grid with row one for first equation and row two for second equation and so on. When you specify multiple row s, then multiple columns will be needed. This grid is the matrix of numbers. concept of tensor depen d's on this properties of matrix. If you multiply two vectors you get a matrix or second rank tensor. Tensor have the additional properties that it's components transform in specific ways.

**"This whole life may be a big dream and nothing but a dream unless when you wake up , you are not deceived by it.."**

#### Pauli equation

In quantum mechanics, the Pauli equation or Schrödinger–Pauli equation is the formulation of the Schrödinger equation for spin-½ particles, which takes into consideration the interaction of the particle's spin with an external electromagnetic field. It is the non-relativistic limit of the Dirac equation and can be utilized where particles are hurling at speeds much less than the speed of light, so that relativistic effects can be neglected. It was formulated by Wolfgang Pauli in 1927. Pauli equation can be stated to be related to an extra term added to the right hand side of Schrodinger equation.

The term on the right side is stern-gerlach term which describes the spin orientation of atoms with one valence electron. Valence electron is the electron in the outermost shell around nucleus , which take s part in chemical bonding. Here atom with one valence bond is considered. The term is calculated by the dot product of Pauli matrices with magnetic field B.

**"time and tide wait for none.."**

Pauli was a mega boss and genius of geniuses. Few scienetists have as much reputation as him. We know him for his famous "exclusion principle" which make it possible to arrange all the elements in a periodic table.

# Explanation

Dirac first derived relativistic quantum theory which is the reconciliation of quantum mechanics with special theory of relativity. Schrodinger equation breaks down for particle moving with high velocity
and it also did not distinguish same particle with different spin.

Spin is a physical quantity which describes certain properties of sub-atomic particle. The story began when Pauli gave his "Exclusion Principle". It states that no two elctrons in an orbital can have same set of four quatum numbers in a quantum system. The spin of electron is the fourth quantum number which uniquely determines state of electron. Spin is very analogous to angular momentum, which takes discrete values. When a charge spins it has a certain way of aligning itself with external magnetic field. Spin of a particle like electron makes it behave certain way in the presence of magnetic field. Dirac equation describes perfectly particles with different spin. Dirac spinor is associated with the spin of electron.

Dirac successfully made Schrodinger equation consistent with relativity by altering the Hamiltonian operator of Schrodinger equation. The wave functions in the Dirac theory are vectors of four complex numbers (known as bispinors), two of which resemble the Pauli wavefunction in the non-relativistic limit, in contrast to the Schrödinger equation which described wave functions of only one complex value. Original equation proposed by Dirac is :

New elements in this equation are the 4 × 4 matrices αk and β, and the four-component wave function ψ. There are four components in ψ because the representation of it at any given point in configuration space is a bispinor. It is construed as a superposition of a spin-up electron, a spin-down electron, a spin-up positron, and a spin-down positron (see below for further discussion).

The 4 × 4 matrices αk and β are all Hermitian and have squares equal to the identity matrix:

The single symbolic equation thus untangle into four coupled linear first-order partial differential equations for the four quantities that make up the wave function. These matrices and the form of the wave function have a deep mathematical bearing. The algebraic structure exhibited by the gamma matrices had been created some 50 years earlier by the English mathematician W. K. Clifford. In turn, Clifford's ideas had emerged from the mid-19th-century work of the German mathematician Hermann Grassmann in his Lineale Ausdehnungslehre (Theory of Linear Extensions).

The equation described above is the modification of Schrodinger equation. Shrodinger equation satisfies a wave function. The wave function gives the probability distribution for the value of each observables like position or momentum. This probability gives the likelihood of finding a partcle at certain place and time.

Spinor was first defined by Pauli as two component wave function , each of which indicates particular spin of electron. Dirac introduced , as a necessity to accommodate negative energy , another pair of components to the wave function. This four component wave function is called spinors. Wave function is usually a complex quantity.
Dirac spinors are two set of vectors , each of which corresponds to unique spin quantum number. These Dirac spinors came naturally from the solution of the Dirac equation. spinors are elements of four component complex vector space. They are not like usual vector and tensors which transform in certain way.

## If you like my writing pls click on google ads on this page or by visiting this page

# Prediction of anti particle

Dirac equation explains the spin 1/2 particles and gives the foundation of Quantum electrodynamics. Moreover it predicted the existence of positron which can have negative mass. When treating particle to have negative energy in this way , each particle field seems to have negative counterpart. Proton has its.counterpart anti-proton, neutrino has its counterpart anti-neutrino, atom as a whole have anti-atom and universe seems to have anti-universe counterpart too. When positron collide with its negative counterpart , annihilation occurs. if this annihilation occurs at low energy , gamma rays are produced. So if you meet your counterpart from distant part of the universe someday you should be serious about shaking your hand with him because both of you can be annihilated. Positron is the negative energy solution of dirac equation.

The electron and positron field ψ has corresponding expression , which solve the dirac equation. The field here has the similar meaning that at each point in space and time it has a value. It is better called relativistic scalar function which does not have usual role in determining probability density like wave function φ The sigma (σ) in the γ matrices(4X4) are pauli 2X2 matrices. u and v are spinors each of which is grouped with two distinct values: one for spin up (+1) and one for spin down(0). That is why they are named spinors.

# Klein -Gordon equation

The manifested field in Klein -Gordon equation is φ which represent energetic particles. The Lagrangian formulation is the kinetic energy of the field subtracted the potential energy as the quantity m multiplied by the complex conjugate of the field(φ +) and φ itself;. Applying euler - lagrange equation for classical path we get the Klein _ Gordon equation. It is quantized version of relativistic energy-momentum relation. Each of the four components ψ1, ψ2, ψ3, ψ4 of the original four-dimensional vector of wave functions (spinors) individually satisfies the Klein-Gordon equation.

Dirac equation implies Klein Gordon equation. They are each other's complementary. If dirac equation holds , then the other also holds. Any solution of the free Dirac equation is, component-wise, a solution of the free Klein–Gordon equation. They can have same kind of solution for the field φ . The key idea behind the quantum field theory is that of quantum harmonic oscillator. It has a Hamiltonian as described by annihilation(a+) and creation operator (a).

### Derivation of Dirac equation

A simple derivation of dirac equation can now be illustrated. Theory of Relativity threw up some road blocks when quantum mechanics was first developed, especially for the particles physicists wanted to look at most, electrons or fermions. For zero spin particles, including relativity appears to be simple. The classical kinetic energy Hamiltonian for a particle in free space, is

The above can be replace with Einstein's relativistic expression

where m is the rest mass and and mc^2 correspond to energy of it. Now we can squaree operator in both sides of Schrodinger equation

to get rid of square root. Finally we get the standard form of dirac equation making it consistent with relativity.

#### Hole theory

The negative E solutions to the equation are troublesome,
for it was assumed that the particle has a positive energy.
Mathematically speaking, however, there seems to be no reason for us to turn down
the negative-energy solutions. Since they exist, we cannot simply disregard them,
for once we include the interaction between the electron and
the electromagnetic field, any electron kept in a positive-energy eigenstate would decay
into negative-energy eigenstates of successively lower energy.
Real electrons obviously do not behave in this way, or
they would disappear by radiating energy in the form of photons.

To adapt with this problem, Dirac introduced the hypothesis, known as hole theory, that the vacuum is the many-body quantum state in which all the negative-energy electron eigenstates are filled up. This description of the vacuum as a "sea" of electrons is called the Dirac sea. Since the Pauli exclusion principle prohibit electrons from occupying the same state, any additional electron would be forced to occupy a positive-energy eigenstate, and positive-energy electrons would be restricted from decaying into negative-energy eigenstates.

If an electron is restricted from simultaneously occupying positive-energy and negative-energy eigenstates, then the charcterstics known as Zitterbewegung, which arises from the interference of positive-energy and negative-energy states, would have to be regarded to be an unphysical prediction of time-dependent Dirac theory. This conclusion may be inferred from the explanation of hole theory given in the previous paragraph. Recent results have been published in Nature [R. Gerritsma, G. Kirchmair, F. Zaehringer, E. Solano, R. Blatt, and C. Roos, Nature 463, 68-71 (2010)] in which the Zitterbewegung feature was simulated in a trapped-ion experiment. This experiment affects the hole interpretation if one infers that the physics-laboratory experiment is not merely a audit on the mathematical correctness of a Dirac-equation solution but the measurement of a real effect whose detectability in electron physics is still beyond reach.

Dirac further argued that if the negative-energy eigenstates are incompletely filled, each unoccupied eigenstate – called a hole – would behave like a positively charged particle. The hole possesses a positive energy since energy is needed to create a particle–hole pair from the vacuum. As noted above, Dirac initially thought that the hole might be the proton, but Hermann Weyl claimed that the hole should behave as if it had the same mass as an electron, whereas the proton is over 1800 times heavier. The hole was eventually interpreted as the positron, experimentally discovered by Carl Anderson in 1932.

It is not entirely satisfactory to describe the "vacuum" using an infinite sea of negative-energy electrons. The infinitely negative contributions from the sea of negative-energy electrons have to be annealed by an infinite positive "bare" energy and the contribution to the charge density and current coming from the sea of negative-energy electrons is exactly canceled by an infinite positive "jellium" background so that the total electric charge density of the vacuum is zero. In quantum field theory, a Bogoliubov transformation on the creation and annihilation operators (turning an occupied negative-energy electron state into an unfilled positive energy positron state and an unoccupied negative-energy electron state into an occupied positive energy positron state) allows us to bypass the Dirac sea formalism even though, formally, it is equivalent to it.

In certain applications of condensed matter physics, however, the underlying ideas of "hole theory" are valid. The sea of conduction electrons in an electrical conductor, called a Fermi sea, posseses electrons with energies up to the chemical potential of the system. An unfilled state in the Fermi sea behaves like a positively charged electron, though it is referred to as a "hole" rather than a "positron". The negative charge of the Fermi sea is balanced by the positively charged ionic lattice of the material.

Soulution to clasical electromagnetism again

A good question is then why a particle at rest does not fall down to the negative levels
radiating the excess energy as electromagnetic radiation. Dirac suggested the following
solution. In what we call vacuum, all the negative energy states are occupied by
electrons.

If a singular electron is placed in this vacuum it cannot fall into a negative energy level
because of the Pauli exclusion principle. We also redefine the energy such that it is zero
for our vacuum, we can do this as we only can measure energy differences. Assume that
we have this vacuum and add energy, for instance in the form of electromagnetic
radiation. We then can lift an electron from the negative “sea” to a positive energy
level. This requires at least 2mc2 . The electron will leave a hole in the negative sea.
This hole will behave as a positive real particle with positive mass and velocity and
momentum in the same direction. Conversely, an electron and a hole can disintegrate
each other radiating electromagnetic radiation. One problem with Dirac’s solution is
that the theory stops being a one-particle theory. For instance, we should take into
account the interactions between the negative sea electrons. Secondly the theory
becomes asymmetric with respect to electrons and positrons. The problem is solved by introducing quantized fields. We should also note that for the Klein-Gordon equation,
that describes particles with spin zero (i.e. bosons) we don’t have the Pauli exclusion
principle and we cannot use Dirac’s solution.

### Notes and additional comments

Atom:

The basic building block of all normal matter, consisting of a nucleus
(which is itself composed of positively-charged protons and zero-charged neutrons)
orbited by a cloud of negatively-charged electrons, so that the positive charge is
exactly balanced by the negative charge and the atom as a whole is electrically neutral.
Atoms range from about 32 to about 225 picometers in size (a picometer is a trillionth of a meter).
A typical human hair is about 1 million carbon atoms in width.

Atom is an mini universe- a solar system to be precise. The interaction between the atom and the outside world is fuzzy. What goes on inside the atom is very mysterious. The nucleus consists of proton and neutron. The strong nuclear force that binds these particle inside the nucleus comes from the reduced mass of the proton and neutrons. The energy can be found by Einstein mass energy equivalence formula. Strong nuclear force is described by quantum field theory. Nucleus is the heart of atom. Electron revolves around the nucleus like planets revolves around the sun. The physical picture of atom with fewer electrons is easy to visualize. As the number of electron increases , the complexity of atom also increases. It is hard to imagine that no two electrons collide with themselves although their orbits may intersect. Their orbits may be circular or elliptic.

Albert Einstein first proved the existence of atoms observing their Brownian movements. Atoms are hard to see with bare eye. Almost five million atoms can fit together on the tip of a ball pen. Democritus first gave the concept of atoms as an indivisible element of matter. The laws of chemistry were developed using the theory of atom put forward by Dalton. Later modern quantum theory were developed in order to understand what is going inside the atom. There are four quantum numbers that truly specify the state of electron inside the atom. First one is principle Quantum number, second is azimuthal quantum number, thrid is magnetic quantum number and the fourth is spin quantum number. These four quantum numbers need some preliminary explanation :

1. Principle quantum number: the principle Quantum number describes the orbits where electron stays with certain energy. It is represented by n=1, 2, 3 and so on

2. Secondary or azimuthal quantum number describes subshell that electron might occupy in certain condition. it is also called orbital angular momentum. For example
in hydrogen atom there is only one subshell of principle Quantum number n =1. In heliumn there are two subshells 1s1 and 1s2.

3. Magnetic quantum number describes the specific orbital (cloud) of the subshells. The value of each magnetic quantum number can be found by projection
of angular momentum into specific coordinate axes. This magnetic quantum number has certain mathematical expression.

4. The spin quantum number describes the intrinsic spin of electrons inside atom. It is much like angular momentum but it is intrinsic like mass and charge.
It is due to spin quantum number that the electron gets aligned in certain direction when an external magnetic field is applied. Spin is , thus,
a vector quantity which has magnitude and direction.

### Quantum mechanical spin

Quantum mechanical spin is a subtle concept . Especially in quantum field theory , where particles are viewed as dots,, it is hard to imagine what "spinning" would actually mean. What really happens is that experiments shows that particles can possess an intrinsic property which is exactly analogous to angular momentum. Moreover , uantum theory shows, and experiments confirm, that particle will generally have angular momentum that is integer multiple of planck constant h. Since classical spinning particles possess an intrinsic angular momentum ( one that is not immutable - it changes as the rotational speed changes ), theoreticians have borrowed the the name "spinning " and applied it to quantum situation. Hence the name "spinning angular momentum". While "spinning like a top" provides a reasonable mental image , it is more accurate to think that particles are defined not only by their mass or charge , nuclear charges but also by instrinsic and immutable spin angular momentum.All of the matter particles (their antimatter partner as well) have spin equal to that of electron. In the language of trade, physicists say that matter particles all have "spin-1/2" where the value 1/2 is , roughly speaking the quantum-mechanical measure of how quickly the particle rotates. Photons, weak gauge bosons, gluons all have spin that is twice that of matter particles . They have spin 1.

## Dirac equation in quantum field theory

In quantum field theory such as quantum electrodynamicsdirac field is subject to a process called second quantization. Second quantization is applied to any field and makes it quantum. One take the hailtonian and quantize it to make quantized dirac field as :This process is similar to the quantization of classical electromagnetic field.

Where a† is the creation operator.

### Electron and geometry

Einstein's law of general relativity in empty space (G(uv) = 0) does not seem to have any reference to the constitution of an empty continuum. It is a law of material structure showing what dimensions a specified coolection of molecules must take up in order to adjust itself to equilibrium with the surrounding conditions of the world.

In particular , electrons must make these adjustments, and it is suggested elsewhere that the symmetry of an electron and its equality with other electrons are not substantial facts, but consequences of the method of measurements. One can not explain of an author for not doing everything, but at this point most readers will feel a desire for some discussion of the theory of measurement. The elementary meaning of measurement of lengths is derived from superposition of supposedly rigid body. A rigid body, as Dr Whitehead has pointed out, is primarily one which seems rigid, such as steel bar in contradistinction to a piece of putty. When I say that a body seems "rigid" , I mean it does not alter its shape and size. This, so far as it can be relied upon, implies some constant relation to the human body: if the eye and the hand grew at the same rate as the "rigid" body, it would look and feel as if it were changingng. But if other objects in our immediate environment did not grow meanwhile , we should infer that we and our measure had grown. There would, however, be no meaning in the supposition that all bodies are bigger in certain places than ther are in certain others; at least, if we suppose the alteration to be in a fixed ratio. If we do not add this proviso, there is a good meaning in the supposition ; in fact, we do actually believe that all bodies are bigger at equator than at the North pole, except such are too small to be visible or palpable. When we say that length of an object at the equator is one metre, we do not mean that its length is that which the standard metre would have if we have moved it from Paris to the equator. But the expansion of bodies with temperature would have difficult if it had not been possible to bring bodies of different temperatures into the same neighborhood and measure them before their temperature becomes equal; it would also have been difficult if all bodies had expanded equally when their temperature rose. These elementary considerations, along with many others, make rigidity an ideal, which actual bodies approach without attaining . Mere superposition thus ceases to give measure of length: it still gives the comparison between the two bodies concerned, but not of either with the standard length unit of length. To obtain the latter, we have to adjust the immediate results of the operation of measuring, by means of a mass of physical theory. If the measures which we obtain are mutually consistent , that is all we can ask; but it is possible that a change in physical theory might have given other measures which would have been also consistent.

### Pure Mathematics

The formalist interpretation of mathematics is by no means new, but for
our purposes we may ignore its older forms. As presented by Hilbert, for
example in the sphere of number, it consists in leaving the integers
undefined, but asserting concerning them such axioms as shall make possible
the deduction of the usual arithmetical propositions. That is to say, we do not
assign any meaning to our symbols 0, 1, 2, . . . except that they are to have
certain properties enumerated in the axioms. These symbols are, therefore,
to be regarded as variables. The later integers may be defined when 0 is given,
but 0 is to be merely something having the assigned characteristics. Accordingly
the symbols 0, 1, 2, . . . do not represent one definite series, but any
progression whatever. The formalists have forgotten that numbers are needed,
not only for doing sums, but for counting. Such propositions as “There were
12 Apostles” or "London has 6,000,000 inhabitants" cannot be interpreted
in their system. For the symbol “0” may be taken to mean any finite integer,
without thereby making any of Hilbert’s axioms false; and thus every
number-symbol becomes infinitely ambiguous.
The formalists are like a
watchmaker who is so absorbed in making his watches look pretty that he has
forgotten their purpose of telling the time, and has therefore omitted to
insert any works.
There is another difficulty in the formalist position, and that is as regards
existence. Hilbert assumes that if a set of axioms does not lead to a contradiction,
there must be some set of objects which satisfies the axioms; accordingly,
in place of seeking to establish existence theorems by producing an
instance, he devotes himself to methods of proving the self-consistency of his
axioms. For him, “existence”, as usually understood, is an unnecessarily
metaphysical concept, which should be replaced by the precise concept of
non-contradiction. Here, again, he has forgotten that arithmetic has practical
uses. There is no limit to the systems of non-contradictory axioms that might
be invented. Our reasons for being specially interested in the axioms that lead
to ordinary arithmetic lie outside arithmetic, and have to do with the application
of number to empirical material. This application itself forms no part of
either logic or arithmetic; but a theory which makes it a priori impossible
cannot be right. The logical definition of numbers makes their connection
with the actual world of countable objects intelligible; the formalist theory
does not.
The intuitionist theory, represented first by Brouwer and later by Weyl, is a
more serious matter. There is a philosophy associated with the theory, which,
for our purposes, we may ignore; it is only its bearing on logic and mathematics.

Reverting back to logic, it is seen that logic is vital to mathematics. Logic have a bearing upon
the thuth of mathematical statements , which pure mathematics uses as a notion apart from logical
constants. Logic has many usage in constructing physical theories. General theory of relativity
is a patchwork of logical notions and mathematics. Physics , from the time of Einstein got new
style from the adoption of the axiomatic approach like as mathematics. The propotions of mathematics are
analytics whereas those of physics are synthetic. Analytic propositions are the propositions of pure mathematics.
Their truth depends on the logical grounds and they serves only to elucidate the meaning already implicit in the subjects.
. On the other hand synthetic propositions refer to the emirical facts. For example ,
the sum of three angles of a triangle is two right angles. This is an example of analytic proposition.
The fact that the sum is two right triangle is true is established on logical grounds , i.e those of
euclid's axioms and propostions. On the other hand all bachelors are unmarried is a synthetic proposition. It is
true by virtue of empirical facts.

**Geometry**

Geometry is classified as two kinds : first the metrical geometry and second the projective geometry. The former involves metrical ideas whereas
the later involves projective transformation, which is somewhat difficult concept.

To begin with metrical geometry it is seen that conditions of free mobility isessential to all measurement of space. It finds the analytical
expression of these conditions in the existence of a space-constant or constant measure of curvature, which is equivalent to homogeneity of space. This is its
firt axiom.

The second axiom is that space has a finite number of dimensions. The point in space can be repsented by a finite number of
dimensions , which can be called the coordinates of the point.

The third axioms assumes the concept of distance. There is a unique distance relationship between two points in space. This relationship
can be expressed with an equation.

These are the axioms of metrical geometry which uses the notion of metric or distance measurement explicitly. And the distance uses the notion of quantity. In
projective geometry we do not have any quanitative comparisons. Only qualitative relations and identity is presupposed in it. Although metrical geometry is prior to projective
geometry. In it , two point uniquely detrmine a line and conversely two lines can uniquely represent a point. Lines and points are equivalent in qualitative perspective.
This duality is the basis of projective geometry. Full account of projective geometry deserves another chapter, which at the moment best left.

All the geometries , surprisingly, have a number of notions and axioms. From these axioms , all the propositions can be deduced logically. We know this very well , from
Euclidean system. All geometries , alike, deal with spatial relations and magintudes. Points , which are infinite division of space , have zero dimenion. Relation between two
points give the quantitative desription of distance. Now in three dimensions, three points not in a stright line determine a plane, in four dimensions four points not in
a plane determine a unique three dimensional figure and in five , five points and so on. This process continues in metrical geometry as the number of dimensions increases.
But in projective geometry this does not happen. At some time the new point included must be one the points mentioned before so that the in (n+1) th step the number of dimensions reduces
to n. This is a speciality of projective geometry.

### Local gauge invariance

The Lagrangian density for a free Dirac particle is given by
L = i∂µ
Ψγ µ
Ψ + mΨΨ

Using Lagrange’s equations
∂µ
∂L
∂( µ
Ψ )
− ∂L
∂Ψ = 0

we get the Dirac equation:

∂µ iγ µ ( Ψ ) − mΨ = iγ µ ∂µ ( − m)Ψ = 0

A local gauge transformation is a transformation where we do the replacement
Ψ →Ψ e
iqΛ(x)
,Ψ →Ψ e
−iqΛ(x)

It is easily seen the the Lagrangian above is not invariant under such a transformation
because of the coordinate dependence on the gauge function Λ

Exercise. Show this.

However, if we replace the derivative according to

∂µ→ Dµ = ∂µ− iqAµ

the covariant derivative, the new Lagrangian is invariant under a local gauge
transformation provided that the vector field Aµ transforms according to

Aµ → Aµ + ∂µΛ

Proof:

L = iDµ

Ψγ µ
Ψ + mΨΨ = i ∂µ ( − iqAµ )Ψγ µ

Ψ + mΨΨ
L → iΨ e
−iΛq
γ µ e
+iΛq iqΨ ∂µΛ + ∂µ
Ψ − iqAµ
Ψ − iqΨ ∂ ( µΛ) + mΨΨ

We see that the offending derivative of Λ disappears and thus the new Lagrangian is
invariant.

The Dirac equation derived from the modified Lagrangian is then

iγ µDµ ( − m)Ψ = iγ µ ∂µ ( ( − iqAµ ) − m)Ψ = 0
The extra term in the Lagrangian is an interaction term between the electron and the
vector field −qΨγ µ
Ψ Aµ . We have earlier seen that Ψγ µ
Ψ is the (four-dimensional)
probability current so with the identification q = e we identify the quantity
Jµ = −eΨγ µ
Ψ with the electrical current and Aµ with the electromagnetic field. We
can add a term to generate the differential equation for the electromagnetic field

1/4 F µν Fµν , F µν = ∂µ Aν − ∂ν Aµ

The equation for the electromagnetic field will be
∂µ ∂µAν =!Aν = Jν

that is precisely the equation you get from Maxwell’s equations. Holaa..

## Atomic physics revisited

Quantum revolution began when Max Planck developed his famous "Planck law" of radiation. He discretized the energy of radiation into small packets or bundles. Next Einstein used his concept to show that light consisted of small packets of energy called photon. De-Broglie showed the duality between waves and particles of matter. Then the developement of quantum theory never stopped. Here is the summary:Electrical quadruple moment is a factor which determines the effective shape of ellipsoid of electric charge distribution. A non-zero value of such factor indicates that the charge distribution is not spherically symmetric .

The quantum meansurement involves discrete values like quantum nuclear spin I and projection K in Z-direction.

Classical picture of atom is

Electron radiates energy continuously and falls into the nucleus. The classical picture is not stable.

Bohr's atom started the journey of old quantum theory. The total energy of an electron in Bohr's atom is

Where fine structure constant α is

The radius of Bohr's orbit is

Differential cross section is a parameter defining the amplitude of the rate of collision between sub-atomic particle. Suppose you throw many electrons towards each other from two places at once randomly. It is very normal that very few electrons will bounce of each other. But if you throw two basketballs at each other from two places the probability of collision is more than that in case of electrons. The size of the objects determines this collision rate. Scattering cross section similar. The more the value of differential cross section the more the collision rate is.

The Kramers-Heisenberg Formula for differential cross section is

Total decay rate of an atom can be found using phase space . We sum over final (photon) states to get the total transition rate. Since both the momentum of the photon and the electron show up in this equation, we will label the electron's momentum to avoid confusion.

The final expression is

The phase space is centered on K` vector with small volume in the k-space of d^3k.

Spin orbital coupling is

Fundamental laws of physics

## Our external physical reality is mathematical structure....

Now let us decompose the electromagnetic radiation...We first decompose the radiation field into its fourier components...

Plugging the fourier decomposition into the formula for hamiltonian density we can find the Hamiltonian

This hamiltonian can be used to quantize EM field. Canonical coordinate and momentum can be found

for the harmonic oscillator at the same frequency. And this relation holds

We write the hamiltonian in terms of these raising and lowering operators.

Hamiltonian can now be rewritten in terms of creation and annihilation operators

The other method of quatizing EM field is

Solution of dirac equation for hydrogen atom can be calculated as

Relativistic correction is the anomalies that arise due to the increase of velocity . Here is the example

Ionization process is give by

## Dirac Lagrangian

Dirac langrangian can be used to find dirac equation. The lagrangian density of Dirac field isIn classical theory Lagrangian is the kinetic energy minus the potential energy. Using analogy the above equation can be derived.

The transformation of Dirac field is specific to Lorentz group.

Quantizing Dirac field involves the application of Euler-Lagrange equation as

Similar method can be applied for the dirac adjoint field .

Hamiltonian density is

All the derivations are not included for the sake of brevity. The derivation can be found here.

Dirac field can be represented in terms of creation and annihilation operators as

Where b's are the operators.

Interaction Hamiltonian is given by time integral of hamiltonian density :

The Bohr model of Hydrogen was successful prediction. The velocity of electron in nth orbit of radius r is

## Scatttering of photon

Photon can be modeled as a qauntized field. This quantized photon field can be used to approximate scattering cross section of photon scattering. The electric dipole approximation is used to simplify the atomic matrix element at low energy where the wavelength is long compared to atomic size. The quantized photon field isEither the term A^2 or the term A.p in the second order contributes to the photon scattering. The amplitudes of both of these are of order e^2. The matrix element of the A^2 term to jump from a photon of wave vector K and an atomic state i to a scattered photon of wave vector K` and an atomic state n is particularly simple since it contains no atomic coordinates or momenta.

The second order term can change the atomic states because of the operator P. The scattering cross section is then

The three terms come from the Feynman diagrams that contribute to the scattering of photon to order e^2.

This result can be specialized for the case of elastic scattering with the help of some commutators.

Lord Rayleigh calculated low energy elastic scattering of light from atoms using classical electromagnetism. If the energy of the scattered photon is less than the energy alloted to excite the atom, then the cross section is proportional to Ω^4, so that blue light scatters more than red light does in the colorless gasses in our atmosphere.

If the energy of the scattered photon is much bigger than the binding energy of the atom, Ω eV. then the cross section tends towards that for scattering from a free electron, Thomson Scattering.

## Helium Atom

The hamiltonian of Helium atom has the same terms as Hydrogen but has a large perturbation due to repulsion between the electrons. The total hamiltonian isThe perturbation due to repulsion of two electrons is the same as that of the rest of the hamiltonian. The first order perturbation is less likely to be accurate. The Helium ground state has two electrons in the 1s level. Since the spatial state is symmetric, the spin part of the state must be antisymmetric so s=0 (as it always is for closed shells). For our zeroth order energy eigenstates, we will utilize product states of Hydrogen wavefunctions.

and ignore the perturbation. The energy for the two electrons in the 1s state is for Z=2 so 4α^2mc^2 = 10. Mev. We can estimate the ground state energy using the first order perturbation theory but it will not be very accurate.

We can improve the estimate of the ground state energy using the variational principle. The main problem with our estimate from perturbation theory is that we are not accounting for changes in the wave function of the electrons due to screening effect. We can perform this in some reasonable approximation by reducing the charge of the nucleus in the wavefunction (not in the Hamiltonian). With the parameter Z*, we get a better estimate of the energy.

The energy of various states can be shown in a chart.

Notice that the variational calculation still uses first order perturbation theory. It just adds a variable parameter to the wavefunction which we use to minimize the energy. This only works for the ground state and for other special states. There is only one permitted 1s state and it is the ground state. For excited states, the spatial states are (usually) different so they can be either symmetric or antisymmetric (under interchange of the two electrons). It turns out that the antisymmetric state has the electrons further apart so the repulsion is smaller and the energy is lower. If the spatial state is antisymmetric, then the spin state is symmetric, s=1. So the triplet states are generally significantly lower in energy than the corresponding spin singlet states. This appears to be a strong spin dependent interaction but is actually just the effect of the repulsion between the electrons having a big effect depending on the symmetry of the spatial state and hence on the symmetry of the spin state. The first exited state has the hydrogenic state content of (1s)(2s) and has s=1. We computed the energy of this state. We'll learn later that electromagnetic transitions which alter spin are strongly suppressedcausing the spin triplet (orthohelium) and the spin singlet states (parahelium) to have nearly separate decay chains.

## Dirac equation revisited

Our goal is to discover the analog of the Schrödinger equation for relativistic spin one-half particles, however, we should note that even in the Schrödinger equation, the interaction of the field with spin was rather ad hoc. There was no exposition of the gyromagnetic ratio of 2. One can incorporate spin into the non-relativistic equation by utilizing the Schrödinger-Pauli Hamiltonianwhich contains the dot product of the Pauli matrices with the momentum operator.A little computation hints that this gives the correct interaction with spin.

This Hamiltonian acts on a two component spinor. We can extend this concept to use the relativistic energy equation. The idea is to replace p with σ.p in the relativistic energy equation.

Instead of an equation which is second order in the time derivative, we can create a first order equation, like the Schrödinger equation, by extending this equation to four components.

Now rewriting in terms of

and ordering it as a matrix equation, we have an equation that can be written as a dot product between 4-vectors.

Pauli matrix is

With this definition, the relativistic equation can be simplified a great deal

Where gamma matrices are given by

These satisfies anti-commutation relation

In fact any set of matrices that satisfy the anti-commutation relations would produce equivalent physics results, however, we will work in the above explicit representation of the gamma matrices. Defining

It satisfies the equation of a conserved 4-current

Also transforms like a 4-vector.

For non-relativistic electrons, the first two components of the Dirac spinor are large while the last two are small.

We use this fact to formulate an approximate two-component equation derived from the Dirac equation in the non-relativistic limit.

This "Schrödinger equation", derived from the Dirac equation, accords well with the one we used to understand the fine structure of Hydrogen. The first two terms are the kinetic and potential energy terms for the unperturbed Hydrogen Hamiltonian. The third term is the relativistic correction to the kinetic energy. The fourth term is the correct spin-orbit interaction, including the Thomas Precession effect that we did not take the time to understand when we did the NR fine structure. The fifth term is the so called Darwin term which we told would come from the Dirac equation; and now it has.

For a free particle, each component of the Dirac spinor quenchs the Klein-Gordon equation.

This is harmonious with the relativistic energy relation.

The four normalized solutions for a Dirac particle at rest are.

## The most mysterious thing about the universe is its comprehensibity..

The first and third have spin up but the second and fourth have spin down. The first and second are positive energy solutions while the third and fourth are ``negative energy solutions'', which we still need to grasp. The next step is to find the solutions with definite momentum. The four plane wave solutions to the Dirac equation are

Where the four spinors are given by

E is positive for solutions 1 and 2 and negative for solutions 3 and 4. The spinors are orthogonal

and the normalization constants have been set so that the states are precisely normalized and the spinors follow the convention given above, with the normalization commensurate to energy. The solutions are not in general eigenstates of any component of spin but are eigenstates of helicity, the component of spin along the direction of the momentum.

Note that E is negative and the exponential

has the phase velocity, the group velocity and the probability flux all in the opposite direction of the momentum as we have defined it. This clearly doesn't make sense. Solutions 3 and 4 need to be grasped in a way for which the non-relativistic operators have not prepared us. Let us simply relabel solutions that have been achieved before such that p -> -p and E -> -E so that all the energies are positive and the momenta point in the direction of the velocities. This means we alter the signs in both solutions mentioned above.

We have plane waves of the form

with the plus sign for solutions 1 and 2 and the minus sign for both solutions . These(+-) sign in the exponential is not very surprising from the perspective of possible solutions to a differential equation. The problem now is that for solutions gotten before the momentum and energy operators must have a minus sign added to them and the phase of the wave function at a fixed position behaves exactly in the opposite way as a function of time than what we anticipate and from other solutions . It is as if solutions of negetive energy are moving backward in time.

If we change the charge on the electron from -e to e and change the sign of the exponent, the Dirac equation remains the invariant. Thus, we can turn the negative exponent solution (going backward in time) into the conventional positive exponent solution if we change the charge to +e. We can reinterpret solutions of negative energy as positrons. We will make this switch more cautiously when we study the charge conjugation operator.

The Dirac equation should be invariant under Lorentz boosts and under rotations, both of which are just changes in the definition of an inertial coordinate system. Under Lorentz boosts, d/dx(u) transform like a 4-vector but the matrices γs are constant. The Dirac equation is shown to be invariant under boosts along the x_i direction if we transform the Dirac spinor according to

with tan hx = β The Dirac equation is invariant under rotations about the k axis if we transform the Dirac spinor according to

with ijk is in a cyclic permutation.

Another symmetry related to the choice of coordinate system is parity. Under a parity inversion operation the Dirac equation remains invariant if

Since

the third and fourth components of the spinor change sign while the first two don't. Since we could have chosen γ$, all we know is that components 3 and 4 have the opposite parity of components 1 and 2

From 4 by 4 matrices, we may derive 16 independent components of covariant objects. We define the product of all gamma matrices.

which obviously anticommutes with all the gamma matrices.

For rotations and boosts, γ commutes with S since it commutes with the pair of gamma matrices. For a parity inversion, it anticommutes with S_P = γ_4. The simplest set of covariants we can make from Dirac spinors and γ matrices are tabulated as

Products of more γ matrices turn out to repeat the same quantities because the square of any γ matrix is 1. For many reasons, it is useful to write the Dirac equation in the traditional form Hψ=Eψ. To perform this, we must separate the space and time derivatives, making the equation less covariant looking.

## Neutron Balance equation

The mathematical formulation of neutron diffusion theory is based on the balance of neutrons in a differential volume element. Since neutrons do not disappear (β decay is ignored) the following neutron balance must be valid in an arbitrary volume V.**rate of change of neutron density = production rate – absorption rate – leakage rate**

Substituting for the different terms in the balance equation and by dropping the integral over (because the volume V is arbitrary) we obtain:

n is the density of neutrons,

s is the rate at which neutrons are emitted from sources per cm3 (either from external sources (S) or from fission (ν.Σf.Ф)),

J is the neutron current density vector

Ф is the scalar neutron flux

Σa is the macroscopic absorption cross-section

In steady state when n is not a function of time

## Diffusion equation

Fick's law is a kind of diffusion equationJ = - J∇φ

which states that neutrons diffuses from high concentration (high flux) to low concentration.

which states, that rate of change of neutron density = production rate – absorption rate – leakage rate. We return now to the neutron balance equation and substitute the neutron current density vector by J = -D∇Ф. Assuming that ∇.∇ = ∇2^ = Δ (therefore div J = -D div (∇Ф) = -DΔФ) we obtain the diffusion equation.

or

## Pauli Exclusion principle

Atomic nuclei are made of protons and neutrons, which attract each other through the nuclear force, while protons repel each other through the electromagnetic force due to their positive charge. These two forces vie, leading to various stability of nuclei. There are only certain combinations of neutrons and protons, which forms stable nuclei. Neutrons stabilize the nucleus, because they attract each other and protons , which helps neutralize the electrical repulsion between protons. As a result, as the number of protons increases, an increasing ratio of neutrons to protons is needed to form a stable nucleus. If there are too many (neutrons also obey the Pauli exclusion principle) or too few neutrons for a given number of protons, the resultant nucleus is not stable and it undergoes radioactive disintegration. Unstable isotopes disintegrate through various radioactive decay pathways, most commonly alpha decay, beta decay, or electron capture. Many other rare types of decay, such as spontaneous fission or neutron emission are known.The Pauli exclusion principle also influences the critical energy of fissile and fissionable nuclei. For example, actinides with odd neutron number are usually fissile (fissionable with slow neutrons) while actinides with even neutron number are usually not fissile (but are fissionable with fast neutrons). Heavy nuclei with an even number of protons and an even number of neutrons are (due to Pauli exclusion principle) due to the occurrence of 'paired spin'. On the other hand, nuclei with an odd number of protons and neutrons are mostly unstable.

Application of Pauli's exclusion principle is seen inside the neutron star. Due to electron degeneracy pressure the neutron star prevents futher collapse. Pauli exclusion principle prevents two fermions from occupying the same energy state at the same time. This creates the so called electron degeneracy pressure which is apparent in neutron star and other dwarf star.

## Lamb shift derivation

The fluctuation in the electric and magnetic fields associated with the QED vacuum disturbs the electric potential due to the atomic nucleus. This perturbation causes a fluctuation in the position of the electron, which explains the energy shift. The difference of potential energy is given bySince the perturbation is isotropic

So we can obtain

The classical equation of motion for the electron displacement (δr)k→ induced by a single mode of the field of wave vector k→ and frequency ν is

and this is valid only when the frequency ν is greater than ν0 in the Bohr orbit, displaystyle ν > π c/a_0. The electron is unable to respond to the fluctuating field if the fluctuations are smaller than the natural orbital frequency in the atom.

For the field oscillating at ν

## The lengend of atomic physics was Robert Oppenheimer who mastered atom more than anybody else..

c.c having the meaning complex conjugate. therefore

where is some large normalization volume (the volume of the hypothetical "box" containing the hydrogen atom). By the summation over all k

This result diverges when no limits about the integral (at both large and small frequencies). As explained above, this method is expected to be valid only when &nu >πc/a_0, or equivalently k> π /a_0. It is also acceptable only for wavelengths longer than the Compton wavelength, or equivalently . Therefore, one can choose the upper and lower limit of the integral and these limits make the result convergent

For the atomic orbital and the Coulomb potential,

Since it is well-known that

For p orbitals, the nonrelativistic wave function vanishes at the origin, so there is no energy shift. But for s orbitals there is some finite value at the origin,

where the Bohr radius is

therefore

Finally, the difference of the potential energy becomes ( after summing all the individual terms in the series):

Where α is the fine structure constant.

You can provide your comment and response about the dirac equation below: